On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 11:59:09AM -0400, Richard Hipp wrote: > You might argue that we should change the definition of leaf to be "A node > that as no children of any kind (merge or non-merge) with the same branch > tag." I'm not sure what the consequences of that change would be, but I'm > betting there would be some and that they would be subtle. Do you think we > should try it?
I personally prefer the current definition of leaf, over this above. Regards, Lluís. _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
