On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 9:04 PM, Joshua Paine <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 5/4/2011 2:58 PM, Stephan Beal wrote: > > As i understand, tickets are normal versioned artifacts. Would that not > > imply that children could be modeled as forks of a parent ticket? > > Except then you've overloaded forking. Tickets can fork already, there's > just no interface to resolve the fork and latest wins. If you make > forking mean something else, what do you do with real forks? i thought maybe each child could be a separate fork, and then be changed in its own branch of the hierarchy. i have no idea if it's feasible, though. -- ----- stephan beal http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
