On May 26, 2011, at 19:08 , Stephan Beal wrote: > On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 7:03 PM, Richard Hipp <d...@sqlite.org> wrote: > >> Exactly. I think it best that this not be a persistent setting, but just a >> command-line option or query parameter. >> > > Or possibly a propagating tag? That would(?) solve the branching/timeframe > issue, i think, by simply taking the latest value (for a given revision) of > the tag's value.
++ But I still believe, that the true problem is storing in the repository things that are not part of the project... Kind regards, Remigiusz Modrzejewski _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
