If you read the second link that Stephan provided you'll find that Fossil may use SQLite as it's backing store, but it's actually a distributed NoSQL database in it's operation.
-B On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 1:08 PM, Brian Cottingham <spiffyt...@gmail.com> wrote: > You sure jumped on that story fast! > > I'm not Dr. Hipp, but since Fossil is based on a relational database while > UnQL is designed for non-relational databases, I doubt we'll see an UnQL > interface. Since UnQL is designed to mimic SQL, I'm not even sure what the > gain would be. > > > On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 1:57 PM, Stephen De Gabrielle > <stephen.degabrie...@acm.org> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Is there an UnQL query interface for fossil in the works? >> >> Stephen >> >> http://www.unqlspec.org/display/UnQL/Home >> http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/doc/trunk/www/theory1.wiki >> >> >> >> -- >> >> -- >> Stephen De Gabrielle >> stephen.degabrie...@acm.org >> Telephone +44 (0)20 85670911 >> Mobile +44 (0)79 85189045 >> http://www.degabrielle.name/stephen >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> fossil-users mailing list >> fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org >> http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users >> > > > _______________________________________________ > fossil-users mailing list > fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org > http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users > > _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
