> Maybe it depends on your specific hardware, but on linux32 (i3 core2) I get > (kubuntu11-04.iso) :
Yay, good then, no need to use OpenSSL. I suspect this is due to LLVM backend of OS X compiler which is default in Lion. For some crypto code I've written it compiles binaries that are slower than the ones produced by the old GCC 4.2. > Clearly, the new code is much better than the old code; Good job! > but it's not clear the openssl code is always a win... I'm not sure whether > or not it's a good idea to try to determine at run time which to use (since > the check overhead has to be measurable after all). Yes, let's leave it as it is. -- Dmitry Chestnykh _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
