On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 11:48 PM, Joshua Paine <[email protected]>wrote:
> If you support base64 encoding, then it leaves open the possibility for > people to build binary file capabilities later (e.g., canvas-based image > editor or some completely-non-web-browser integration). > i'd like to (at least initially) not consider binary data, nor any features which require that a given client implement (correctly) any given decoding algorithm other than JSON. Any time any algo is added to the client-side interface, the portability drops. -- ----- stephan beal http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
