On Tue, 20 Sep 2011 17:19:34 +0200 Stephan Beal <sgb...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> i'm just curious - is there any interest out there in integrating > jimtcl with fossil, e.g. as a replacement for th1? While i'm not > currently a tcl user, binding C/C++ code to scripting languages is a > hobby of mine (e.g. http://code.google.com/p/v8-juice), and i'd be > interested in assisting with such an effort, but until the JSON API > is done i couldn't take it on myself. If we had the full power of > tcl, as opposed to the minimalistic th1, we could almost certainly do > some really cool things with it, e.g. adding new features completely > in tcl. Not that I ever had any need to touch either th1 or jimtcl, but I'd like to ask an obligatory question: what are the current th1's shortcomings so that replacing it with something else is needed? _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
