On 09/26/11 15:02, Richard Hipp wrote: >> Richard seem to have released 1.19 binary for Windows compiled with Visual >> Studio, while 1.18 >> has been compiled with MinGW. >> >> > Correct. I didn't realized there was a difference. > > Should I make a point of always building future Fossil releases using MinGW > instead of MSVC?
I think it's good when applications behave the same way across platforms, but I think it's even better when applications behave appropriate on the platform it's running on. On Windows, it is expected (as in 'defacto-standard') that *.* includes all files in the current directory. If building using MinGW makes that happen, while building with VS does not, then I say go with MinGW. On a semi-related note: Do the Windows binaries include SSL support? -- Kind regards, Jan Danielsson
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
