On Tue, 25 Oct 2011 18:51:05 -0700 Caleb Gray <ca...@calebgray.com> wrote:
[...] > 3) The web interface could use a face lift, as well as some HTML5 > functionality. > > I've got a lot of web development experience and would love to > contribute in this area, also. > > All of the work on the JSON APIs is a great step toward making the > entire interface XHR compatible. What are the community's feelings on > jQuery? I get the gist that externals are trying to be avoided, so > that's why I'm asking, I would love to write a library that turns the > current site in to a highly interactive version without touching the > HTML or CSS at all. I strongly disagree. First, please don't fix what's not broken. Web UI does what it's intended to do, and does it well. JS usage is constrained to what can't be done without it (those arrows in the timeline view), and it's even usable with JS turned off. P.S. I'm one of those crazy folks who usually has NoScript turned on except for the intranet sites, so yes, I'm biased. _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
