Hey folks.

So far, most of my Fossil use has been on projects I own almost exclusively. However, I'm about to start working on projects with a community, and while I'm going to push Fossil adoption hard, I may get some pushback from Git users. Is it possible to use Fossil in a workflow with people who would rather use Git/Github? IOW, can I make Fossil my official project source but periodically push updates to Github, then import the results of people's contributions into the official repo?

I see an incremental option for import. I'm guessing this helps with that? Can I just incrementally import the latest changes from Git repositories? I'm guessing this just adds in changesets from Git that aren't present in Fossil?

I don't see a symmetric option in the export command. Do I just have to keep exporting the full repository each time? I'm guessing that the exports should be identical such that when I go to push the new export to Github, that it won't look like an entirely new repo.

Hoping that I can push Fossil adoption for these projects, but I'm worried that I'll have to use the lowest common denominators in these communities, and in this case that will be Git. In that case, I'd really rather build the project/site in Fossil, then win people over when they realize that their Fossil clone of the project includes the wiki, ticketing system, etc. and their Git pulls don't. :)
_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Reply via email to