2011/11/13 Lluís Batlle i Rossell <vi...@viric.name> > I agree with Julian. There should be an answer, if the letter does not > reach the > list. I also like when it is not required to subscribe to send mails. >
In my experience, requiring subscription cuts down greatly on the amount of noise and essentially blocks all (or 99% of) spam from mailing lists. > I don't think the write is related to the SIGBUS. > i don't think it has anything directly to do with it, either. i suspect it's just bad timing or possibly memory corruption caused by stack abuse at some other point. That said, i think that any such bug is probably compiler-specific, since none of us are seeing it on non-sparc platforms. i will run push/pull through valgrind this evening, but i don't expect to see anything more drastic than a couple of "standard" leaks we have in (e.g.) the argument/parameter handling. > If it is similar to 'strace', > the "= 512" means that the syscall succeeded and returned 512. > correct: 512 is the return value of the write() call, == the number of bytes it was asked to write (512). -- ----- stephan beal http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
