On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 4:03 PM, Eric <e...@deptj.eu> wrote:

> On Fri, December 2, 2011 7:26 pm, Stephan Beal wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 8:17 PM, Eric <e...@deptj.eu> wrote:
> >
> >> Why on earth would you want to?
> >>
> >> I know others have offered suggestions and explanations for how to do
> >> it,
> >> but I would never have a "dotfile" (or a symlink for that matter) in a
> >> repository, so I'm really asking about the use-case.
> >>
> >>
> > Think ".gitignore" and friends. Some tools support files like that for
> > holding various metadata (some non-git tools support .gitignore).
> >
> > http://gitready.com/beginner/2009/01/19/ignoring-files.html
> >
>
> Oh, I know about those. But they are one of
>
> 1) needed at build or install time, in which case the build and install
> scripts create them
>
> 2) part of my common development environment, in which case they are not
> part of what I am developing and do not belong in its repository
>

Do I detect a hint of judgment in your post Eric? Items 1. and 2. are true
in your world perhaps but certainly often not in mine. I lost an hour of my
time because fossil silently ignored dot files that are a required critical
part of a process that I moved from an ancient SCM into fossil. Personally
I prefer my tools to let me know if i say "add" and they choose not to do
so however the --dotfiles switch suffices.

There are a few interesting arenas where "source" is not C, nor any other
language you are likely to deal with as a "normal" programmer and yet these
arenas can make good use of a tool like fossil and some even pay pretty
dang good and maybe even deserve a bit of respect :)


> Eric
>
> --
> ms fnd in a lbry
>
> _______________________________________________
> fossil-users mailing list
> fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
> http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
>
_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Reply via email to