Sorry, I think the answer to that is "it depends". For example do you care about having a small repository? Are you worried about corruption? For me, I wouldn't think twice about it. Even a thousand commits, each with their own pdf of even 1MB is still only 1GB. Unless these are big PDF's, I wouldn't worry about it too much.
Then again, I have no direct experience in this regard. I've used fossil for LabView programming, the files for which are binary and I don't think very compressible. But even 866 files taking up 40 MB, with about 100 commits, some of which change a large minority of files, the fossil repo is still only 400 MB. I wouldn't call that bloated, but YMMV. Tomek On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 7:46 PM, Guilherme P. de Freitas < guilhe...@gpfreitas.com> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Thanks for your answers, but the question is: won't that bloat the > repository too much? > > -- > Guilherme P. de Freitas > http://www.gpfreitas.com > _______________________________________________ > fossil-users mailing list > fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org > http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users >
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users