On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 01:07:30PM -0500, Ron Wilson wrote: > On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Lluís Batlle i Rossell <vi...@viric.name> > wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 05, 2012 at 02:34:30PM -0500, Leo Razoumov wrote: > > Well, even that alone would not be enough. I meant for cases where it is > > *very > > important* not to push the work. :) > > > > But I suspect that there are people using fossil and having a reasonable > > workflow for those cases. I wonder what they use. > > Mark your branch private. > > Anything you want to push can then be merged into a non-private branch.
Ah, well, that's fine for personal work. I meant a bit how to do private collaborative work over a public fossil base. Sorry that I did not state all I had in mind clear enough. Additionally, it looked to me that there have been some flaws in the code related to 'private' branches, so I'm understanding that this feature is not under much testing (as in broad usage). Thank you, Lluís. _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
