hmm, on Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 08:19:36AM -0000, Eric said that > fossil update is concerned only with the branch you have in your checkout > directory. If autosync is on it does a pull first, but that's a separate > operation, and it os concerned only with artifacts in the repository and > knows nothing about branches. I wish people would stop expecting fossil to > behave like git, if it did you might as well use git.
i have never used git. i would simply prefer fossil to report nothing if there is nothing to report... $ fossil up $ come to think of it, as a developer i am not really interested in fossil's traffic statistics either, it is more distracting than useful and would expect such extra information under --verbose. perhaps my minimalism is too maximal :] regarding git, i think it's not unreasonable to compare programs that in one way or the other server the same purpose, no? no need to be touchy about it. -f -- the greatest hate springs from the greatest love. _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
