On Feb 26, 2012, at 15:00 , Leo Razoumov wrote: > On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 04:48, Stephan Beal <sgb...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 9:48 PM, Leo Razoumov <slonik...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> I sincerely hope that fossil was not designed with only one work-flow >>> (SQLite and fossil) in mind. Am I mistaken? >> >> >> If i'm not sorely mistaken, fossil was indeed originally designed for >> exactly one purpose: managing the sqlite repo. >> > > GIT was originally designed as a BitKeeper replacement for linux > kernel. Then the scope broadens...
Well, IIRC Mercurial was even more narrow, originally created to keep only some subsystem of the kernel ;) Kind regards, Remigiusz Modrzejewski _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
