Hi, Sorry for my radio silence over the weekend. I have to say, I'm a tad caught off guard by the sudden enthusiasm for this feature!
Anyway, what I need most is community feedback on some open questions. You can find most of my open questions in the fossil-dev archives. (Unfortunately, it looks like you need to sign up for that list to see them.) Right now, I need to do some other work, but, I'll try to carve out some time this afternoon to summarize the open questions and give an overview of what I'd like to push into a branch on the master repo once the feature has more testing. -B On Saturday, February 25, 2012 at 7:37 PM, Leo Razoumov wrote: > On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 21:30, Jan Danielsson > <[email protected] (mailto:[email protected])> wrote: > > On 02/26/12 03:09, [email protected] (mailto:[email protected]) wrote: > > > Why not just productize limsync? > > > > > > Going by what Brian Smith has written, it's a question of having time > > do work on it and handling a few special cases. > > > > Brian, if you need any kind of assistance, please let us know. I > > really want this feature. > > > > > I also offered my help to Brian in limsync testing. Right now limsync > still has some bugs. For instance, attempts to pull trunk from main > fossil repo into limsync repo stops well short of its leaf. On the > other hand, when ready limsync should be very useful. > > --Leo-- > _______________________________________________ > fossil-users mailing list > [email protected] (mailto:[email protected]) > http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users > >
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
