On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 15:52:12 +0100 Ephrim Khong <dr.khong+fos...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It seems, though, that the AsciiDoc-Backend simply translates text > from AsciiDoc-Markup to Fossil-Markup. Correct. > There is no real integration in fossil, and it seems that it can not > be used from within fossil as a markup substitute. Well, considering that even Fossil itself is moving/moved towards embedded docs, I do not see a problem using AsciiDoc as markup for our documentation, keep 'em as source under Fossil and use ascii-fossil backend to render them on the server without any need for heavy Docbook-based toolchain. Sincerely, Gour -- One who is able to withdraw his senses from sense objects, as the tortoise draws its limbs within the shell, is firmly fixed in perfect consciousness. http://atmarama.net | Hlapicina (Croatia) | GPG: 52B5C810
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
