On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 09:50:02 -0400
Miles Fidelman <mfidel...@meetinghouse.net> wrote:
> Just started using Fossil for a new project - it just seems so much
> easier than git, and the integrated wiki and ticketing system just
> simplifies things a lot.
Yup.
> A question to the group: To what extent are any of you using Fossil for
> managing documentation associated with projects - any or all of
> developer, user, administrator, sys admin (configuration files,
> configuration notes, shell scripts, cfengine/puppet/chef recipes,
> tickets, checklists, procedures, user account info, logbooks), etc.?
I use the wiki for developer docs for clients that don't already have
a preferred tool for those, or a preferred SCM other than fossil. Docs
for the users/admins wind up stored in fossil, but normally aren't
done in the wiki.
There's a tension here in that I also use Google Docs for writing
documentation. Things like architectural diagrams wind up there, and
get links in the wiki. If the client has a google id, I'll give them
write access to such, so there's a pull to keep everything there. I'm
still working that division out.
<mike
--
Mike Meyer <m...@mired.org> http://www.mired.org/
Independent Software developer/SCM consultant, email for more information.
O< ascii ribbon campaign - stop html mail - www.asciiribbon.org
_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
