Le 27 avril 2012 12:14, Natacha Porté <nata...@instinctive.eu> a écrit : > Hello, > > on Thursday 26 April 2012 at 00:53, Ivan Vilata i Balaguer wrote: >> chris (2012-04-22 17:09:45 +0200) wrote: >> >> > Please check out >> > >> > https://server.ac-drexler.de/fossil/fossil/doc/tip/addons/markdown.md >> > >> > for an integration proposal of the discount library with the build >> > system of fossil. >> > >> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > ## Markdown support for fossil >> > >> > after looking for additional markup support for fossil I found [this >> > thread][1]. With the references and some afternoon work I managed to >> > integrate Markdown as an additional mime-type .md that the doc >> > interface handles in a similar way to .wiki& .txt. >> >> Looks nice! You may also be interested in my enhanced version of Bill >> Burdick's Fossil pagedown software which does client-side rendering of >> wiki pages and embedded `.wiki` and `.txt` docs starting with >> `@pagedown` and (similarly to your solution) all embedded docs ending in >> `.md.txt` (of course with no changes at all to Fossil and keeping repos >> portable). > > Since we are talking about alternatives for markdown-in-fossil, you > might remember my repeated mentions about integrating my [markdown > library][libupskirt] into fossil. > > To be perfectly honest, I lost interest in the idea, and went for the > generated embedded docs idea (same as what was previously said with > AsciiDoc). Even though I still don't like putting generated stuff into > the SCM, I find it to be a lesser evil compared to the risk of > spectacular failure when embedding such complex code into fossil, > especially with regard to security (since it's the same binary, a > vulnerability in the markdown code can mean read/write access to at > least the whole sqlite database). > > So my question is now, is there anybody willing to take it over, or do I > just send it to the heaven for bits? > > For the record, I think the main pros my library still has over discount > is legal stuff (I can hand over copyright of fossil's fork any time) and > direct support from me. However these are probably not worth much if > merge into official release is still not going to happen. >
Well performance is also very good point for your library, it out performs discount by far and consumes far less memory. regards, Bapt _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
