On Fri, 25 May 2012 16:10:44 +0000 <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, 25 May 2012 11:53:35 -0400 > Richard Hipp <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 11:42 AM, > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > Is it possible to avoid squashing all private commits into one? > > > > > > > The branch is private. If all the individual commits where pushed > > out to the world, it wouldn't be private any more and the whole > > purpose of having a private branch would be defeated, no? > > > > That's one interpretation of private, yes. I took it to mean that the > branch wouldn't be synced, or visible, on any remotes. I don't think > that necessarily implies coalescing commits like that... > > If it's not possible, I can live with it, I'll just switch to only > using public branches. Is it possible to get those commits into trunk in any way? Losing the details isn't acceptable (due to my misunderstanding of exactly what a private branch entailed). _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
