Hi Stephan and List,

You posted some good ideas and took on the difficult job of beginning the development spec. The Münich event addressed some of the points you consider below. As you remember the event occasionally split into groups and Richard took the time to discuss and clarify a few of the points below in a small group.

For 1). Another migration path that "natively" supports this method is the source documentation method used by SQLite. As you know; SQLite documentation is written in the c sources and Tcl scripts pull it into the finished documentation form. These docs and scripts are available on the docs respository. Generating source documentation would be an alternative to 1). Richard was kind enough in one of these "small groups" to outline the basics of this system. I noted the originating files and could forward it if desired.

2) Custom pages serve output in one of the following forms:


If TH1 is not powerful enough for this case (i don't know if it is or isn't, or if it is easy enough to extend), the next obvious choice would be the TCL support (which is, AFAIK, still living in its own branch?).

For 2) Joe Mistachkin's previous answer in this thread simplifies these considerations. According to the information given at the Munich Event enabling Tcl will either enable the system Tcl or the abbreviated, small footprint version Jim. Link: Jim Tcl Jim Home http://jim.tcl.tk/index.html/doc/www/www/index.html . These options can provide the needed scripting support.

Tcl also offers a possible alternative to jquery. tDom http <http://wiki.tcl.tk/http>://tdom.github.com/ contains XPath which queries the Dom and parse Html. I also agree that Tcl use should be pursued.

- Gary Gabriel

_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Reply via email to