On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Weber, Martin S <[email protected]>wrote:
> Often I will run the following two commands: > fossil add <list of files> > ^add^ci > (i.e., fossil ci <list of files>) immediately afterwards. > Sometimes I forget the second step and then do some funny stuff (changing > trunks, merging etc.) until I stumble over the uncommitted files. > > Is there anything speaking against adding a --commit (and maybe --message) > option to add so that it'll commit immediately? > Why do you think you will be more likely to type "--commit" after "fossil add" than you would be to type "; fossil commit"? > > -Martin > > _______________________________________________ > fossil-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users > -- D. Richard Hipp [email protected]
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
