Hello, on Monday 30 July 2012 at 18:53, Stephan Beal wrote: > On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 10:41 AM, Natacha Porté <[email protected]>wrote: > > > What remains to do: > > + review my code to ensure it meets fossil level of quality, > > + format it using fossil code style if needed, > > + any other code change that comes up during the review. > > > > i will be happy to offer my 0.0163 Euros, but i won't be able to do so > until later in the week. Richard is, from what i understand, swamped for > the foreseeable future.
No problem at all, I'm genuinely that patient. You could tell me nobody would have time to look at it in 2012, and that would be fine with me and I wouldn't send any other reminder before end of Januray 2013. > Of course, anyone else is encouraged to help :). Indeed, all constructive criticism about my code is always welcome, even if the code turns out to be eventually rejected. That's how I have always been able to make any progress in my programming skills. > While i don't personally use MD i'd like to see it added if only because > people keep asking about it ;). Maybe then some of the religious wars can > end ;). And some other can start, for example which superset of Markdown to settle for :-) And this is only half a joke, since raw Markdown is quite limited, and its inventor refuses any further evolution. So most software actually supports a kind of extended Markdown, but there is little consistency in the exact set of extensions. It's Babel all over again. I didn't mention that as an open question, because that will be moot if the library is rejected, but before having a real markdowned-fossil release the question will have to be answered. > i will post back once i have looked over it. Would you prefer that i send > comments regarding it to the list or to you directly? I don't have any preference in that regard, either way suits me as well. So I guess it boils down to whether the rest of the list is interested in such comments or whether they would rather avoid the extra spam. > And thank you for your contribution and persistence. Sure :-) And thank you for the heartwarming answer ^^ Still, I'm never sure where is the line between persistence as a good trait and persistence as a bad one. I hope I haven't crossed it yet. > To be clear: the final decision about what goes in to the trunk belongs to > Richard and Richard alone. The other contributors, such as a myself, are > here to assist, but the final decision rests with him. For what i'd worth, > i'd like to see it included (but would like to look at the code first ;). Of course, that's as much as I expected. I consider any comment on my code I get from here as a privilege. Thanks for your interest, Natacha Porté
pgpDlRV7mKtu0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
