On 3 August 2012 12:26, Remigiusz Modrzejewski <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> Note there are JavaScript hacks for interpreting random wiki syntax so >>>> you can have markdown interpreted without any direct support in >>>> fossil. >>> >>> Note there are good wiki engines out there, so no need for one in Fossil >>> too. But once we set the scope to include something, please don't keep it >>> half-hearted... >> >> And it has been said that markdown is out of the scope of Fossil. I am >> not to decide that but I have to agree. Once you let in markdown >> people used to some other wiki syntax would argue they have needlessly >> hard time and there would be no end to the stream of requests to >> include yet another. > > > I've read the "we'll have requests for all the markups in the world" argument > many times. I can't remember anyone actually coming and asking for *anything* > else than markdown. That may also prove only that markdown proponents are noisy and inconsiderate. Project X should have markdown because it is what I am familiar with and it seems to me the best and most widespread syntax, meh. Regards Michal _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
