On 3 August 2012 14:45, Stephan Beal <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 11:48 AM, Michal Suchanek >> >> I am not opposed to writing patches, and all these issues are quite >> trivial but I am also aware that some patches are rotting in the >> fossil tickets for years so I guess patches are not what gives you >> fixed fossil. > > > i suspect the main problem there is that fossil lacks triggers/email > notifications (for portability reasons), and if the ticket doesn't get > noticed in the first page of the timeline view (the first 20 entries) then > it probably goes unnoticed more often than not. >
Another problem is that fossil needs a contributor agreement so random patches attached to the tickets are not going to make it into fossil. Thanks Michal _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
