* Stephan Beal <[email protected]> [20120803 15:34]: > > Another consideration here is that the wiki has kind of fallen out of use, > with the embedded docs system generally being preferred. While i admit that > i pay a good deal of attention to fossil's wiki API (i've added several of > the wiki subcommands and the wiki API was amongst the first of the JSON > APIs added), i will admit that embedded docs are generally a better > solution. But the wiki is just too convenient (which is the only reason > anyone really uses a wiki, anyway). Once i get embedded docs support in the > JSON API, i probably won't touch the wiki API again.
I believe you are underestimating the built-in wiki. As I see it is one of fossil's killer features: my use case is a dramatically lower barrier to entry for non-developers contributing to a non-distributed repo. qvb -- pica _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
