On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 8:33 AM, Eugen Leitl <eu...@leitl.org> wrote:
> > Hi, > > I'm a new list subscriber, and currently investigating fossil > as alternative to redmine/chiliproject. > > Is it possible to run multiple instances of fossil on several > machines which auto-synchronize automatically upon changed > content (wiki, tickets, etc.)? That's how the self-hosting Fossil repositories work. See http://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/doc/trunk/www/selfhost.wiki for additional information. The SQLite repositories work the same way (of course - since Fossil was originally written for the purpose of managing the SQLite project.) > I'm looking at one master-many slaves > (each of them can become a master in case the original master > is dead). > > This is for improved reliability. > > Am I in luck? > > Thanks, > Eugene > _______________________________________________ > fossil-users mailing list > fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org > http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users > -- D. Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
