On 09/13/12 16:02, Richard Hipp wrote: > Is there any reason to try to keep Fossil working on windows9x?
I don't think much Win9x development goes on today. But even if I'm wrong, I would guess that the intersection between the sets "Win9X developers" and "Fossil users" is roughly empty. Tag last win95-compatible version so anyone so inclined can dig it up easily, just in case? -- Kind regards, Jan Danielsson
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users