On 09/13/12 16:02, Richard Hipp wrote:
> Is there any reason to try to keep Fossil working on windows9x?

   I don't think much Win9x development goes on today. But even if I'm
wrong, I would guess that the intersection between the sets "Win9X
developers" and "Fossil users" is roughly empty.

   Tag last win95-compatible version so anyone so inclined can dig it up
easily, just in case?

-- 
Kind regards,
Jan Danielsson


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Reply via email to