Thank you very much for the answer. Sure, I will try to change my status check habits. Hopefully, it is not going to be very hard. :) As for clutter in a repository, I am heavily relying on ignore files, exactly as Noam Postavsky have suggested.
On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 2:33 AM, Jan Danielsson <[email protected]>wrote: > On 09/15/12 00:17, Dmitry Chuev wrote: > > I am newbie Fossil user and I wonder what is the reason to have two > > different commands to show a checkout status: status and extras. In SCM > > (Git, Svn) I have worked before there is single status command to show > both > > modified and new (i.e. not part of a checkout) files. Would not it be > more > > easier and "standard" to have just one single command to view status ? > > > > Thank you for the explanation in advance. > > I like that fossil status isn't cluttered. I regularly generate > source documentation using doxygen in my source tree, and "fossil > extras" just shows me all the gazillion files doxygen created. > > Try living with it for a while and see if you change your mind. I did. > > -- > Kind regards, > Jan Danielsson > > > > _______________________________________________ > fossil-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users > >
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
