On 29.09.2012 15:48, Barak A. Pearlmutter wrote:
Please send a proper URL for bug reports against the Debian/Ubuntu packages.
Sure. You can look at
http://bugs.debian.org/fossil
http://packages.qa.debian.org/f/fossil.html
Although bugs can be submitted by manually composing email, the
reportbug(1) program is probably best, as it composes appropriate
email including exhaustive version information.
Thank you! At the attention of the Debian/Ubuntu users - please
bookmarks these URLs and remember to use the your reportbug tool. These
should serve as first level of support for you.
Throwing OS specific (package version in the OP case) issues directly to
the project developers often leads to suboptimal workarounds, which
being recorded "as-is" by the archives, result in unnecessary (sometimes
quiet) frustration for the future users.
I'm the Debian maintainer, not responsible for Ubuntu, but I believe
Ubuntu is taking the Debian package without modification.
So, from the Debian package page it is obvious that you are doing your
job as maintainer just perfectly - 1.23 has been packaged only a couple
of days after the upstream release (month before this thread). The same
for 1.22 and before + zero pending bugs in the tracker.
Barak, is it possible and safe for an Ubuntu user to pull with apt-get
the newest Debian package version for testing? Something equivalent of:
yum --enablerepo=rawhide update fossil
in Fedora.
Thank you,
Alek
_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
