On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 3:19 AM, K <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > > I have a project which is currently comprised of three components; one > library and two programs which include the library. > > What would be, if any, the benefits to using a single repository for these > 3 products vs 3 individual repositories? >
The SQLite project (for which Fossil was designed) is kept in multiple repositories. There is one repository for the main SQLite source code and the TCL test suite. There is a separate repository for the documentation. Two other repositories host the TH3 and SqlLogicTest test suites. Then there are separate repositories for proprietary extensions, SEE, CEROD, and ZIPVFS. I don't know that this necessarily the best way to organize things. But it has worked well for us so far. > > > ^K > _______________________________________________ > fossil-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users > -- D. Richard Hipp [email protected]
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
