On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 07:28:30AM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 4:32 AM, Lluís Batlle i Rossell 
> <[email protected]>wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 06:20:02AM +0000, K wrote:
> > >
> > > This is as a result of a featured added on my behalf, I'm afraid.
> > >
> > > There should now be (I haven't found occasion to update my Fossil to 1.24
> > > given I'd have to repatch the wiki page name length requirement) an
> > option
> > > somewhere allowing the treatment of [xxx] as wiki mark up.
> >
> > Sorry, what is this new feature about, and its consequences? And the
> > motivation
> > of the change?
> >
> > I might have missed the rationale.
> >
> Please tell me why you think this is not a good idea?  If necessary, it can
> be made optional.  But I couldn't think of a reason to display broken links
> in red rather than just not transforming them at all.

Thank you for the explanation; now that I know the intended behaviour, it looks
fine to me. No objection. :)

_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Reply via email to