Another suggestion: Since visual diffs are always for text files (I think), it doesn't make much sense to mark partial words as changed. If the whole word is not unchanged, then the whole word is changed. I am referring to things like line 73817 on the left in the fourth link below.
On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 4:16 AM, Richard Hipp <[email protected]> wrote: > Reposted from fossil-dev: > > OLD: http://www2.sqlite.org/src/ci/52e755943f?sbs=1#chunk1 > NEW: http://www.sqlite.org/src/ci/52e755943f?sbs=1#chunk1 > > OLD: > http://www2.fossil-scm.org/fossil/fdiff?v1=955cc67ace8fb622&v2=e2e1c87b86664b45#chunk24 > NEW: > http://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/fdiff?v1=955cc67ace8fb622&v2=e2e1c87b86664b45#chunk24 > > Comments, suggestions, and (constructive) criticism are all welcomed. > Also welcomed are examples of diffs that do not perform well using the new > diff logic. > > Note that I will eventually update the Fossil executables on the "OLD" > machines above, so if you are viewing this more than a week or so after it > was posted (2012-12-14) then the OLD and NEW will likely look the same. > > -- > D. Richard Hipp > [email protected] > > _______________________________________________ > fossil-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users > > -- ˙uʍop-ǝpısdn sı ɹoʇıuoɯ ɹnoʎ 'sıɥʇ pɐǝɹ uɐɔ noʎ ɟı
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
