Michael Richter decía, en el mensaje "Re: [fossil-users] Fossil vs. Git/Mercurial/etc.?" del Domingo, 30 de Diciembre de 2012 02:11:46:
> There's use cases for every bizarre feature in every bizarre SCM (distributed > or otherwise) out there. Let's not turn Fossil into the C++ of DSCMs, shall > we? If you *really, positively, /absolutely/* must have rebase, Git is > that-a-way. Insisting that Fossil should turn into Git is not a viable > argument. *standing ovation* -- o-=< Marcelo >=-o _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
