On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Stephan Beal <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi, Ross, Pirate, und Co.,
>
Request for comments: how should the list of file-level changes be
structured for the output? Here are the options which come to mind (but
feel free to suggest something else):
{
"filename1": "edited",
"filename2": "missing",
...
}
or...
[
{ "name": "filename1", "status": "edited"},
{ "name": "filename2", "status": "missing"},
...
]
or...
{
"edited": [ "filename1", "filenameN" ],
"missing": [ "filename2", ... ],
...
}
... or something entirely different?
:-?
--
----- stephan beal
http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/
http://gplus.to/sgbeal
_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
