On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Matt Welland <[email protected]> wrote:
> > We can't switch to WAL mode currently as these repos are accessed from > multiple machines via NFS. Now that ssh is working for us we can > convert over to using ssh to a central server and switch to WAL mode > at the same time. Is there any downside to using ssh? How dramatic is > the performance improvement with WAL mode? > The big advantage of WAL mode is that readers won't block writers. That can be a huge deal on a busy site. But the biggest gains you'll see will come from using ext4 instead of nfs as our filesystem. My gut instinct is that ssh will probably work better for this. Let me know if you encounter problems with it. -- D. Richard Hipp [email protected]
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
