Thus said Miles Fidelman on Mon, 13 May 2013 16:09:30 -0400: > I also wonder if it effected the choice of whether to use fossil or > not for various projects. I know that, personally, there are a few > places that I've wanted to START with versioned documentation, and > would have jumped on Fossil in an instant if the pieces where there.
One can always version control the documents in a separate directory called docs. ;-) Of course it won't be served up via Wiki, but maybe it could be automated (e.g. after checkin, do a recursive commit of all the files in the docs directory with fossil wiki commit or something). One of the things that did attract me to Fossil was the ability to link or associate specific commits for fixes to tickets and have it all show up nicely in the timeline. Andy _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
