2013/6/24 Stephan Beal <sgb...@googlemail.com>:
> You have no idea how many times i've shot myself in the foot by cleaning up
> my fossil binary while busy breaking fossil's code (my only copy of the
> binary is the one from the trunk). My fault, not fossil's, since i clean up
> using makefile rules and subscribe the school of thought which believes that
> generated binaries belong in the 'clean' rules.
I'm using [fossil clean --ignore ""] exactly for this reason: start with a clean
build environment except for the fossil binary, without depending on the
makefile rules I didn't write ;-)
> Why is the first one BIG and the second not? i would consider the second
> condition more important than the first.
No special reason. I would prefer both to be big, but the second message
already existed and it is small now. It's not crucial to me how the
message looks like, but I think fossil should at least show something.
Thanks!
Regards,
Jan Nijtmans
_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
