On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 4:52 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger <jo...@britannica.bec.de> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 12:08:42AM +0200, Isaac Jurado wrote: >> After the results, the conclusion is obvious: the generic artifact delta >> compression is outperforming the delta manifest convention. >> >> So the question is, what is the rationale behind delta manifests? >> After checking Fossil's history, it looks like they were added after >> artifact delta compression. Which actually seems even more >> confusing. > > Delta manifests are not meant to reduce the repository size, but the > amount of parsing to be done.
That sounds intriguing. What kind of operations can complete without having to load the baseline manifest at all? Cheers. -- Isaac Jurado "The noblest pleasure is the joy of understanding" Leonardo da Vinci _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
