On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 5:33 PM, Steve Landers <st...@digitalsmarties.com>wrote:
> > On 24/07/2013, at 6:25 AM, Baruch Burstein <bmburst...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Having recently graduated and on my first job, I am very interested in > what seems to me to be completely irrational. In the past year I have found > that most "irrational" things are really just my lack of experience showing > :-) > > That is one of the more profound statements I've read recently, thanks :) > > As a Tcl greybeard, let me point out that it supports IPv6, safe > threading, coroutines, tailcalls/stackless, generators, very good > internationalisation and localisation, easily embedded or you can embed C > within it, event-driven I/O, a modern OO system (or you can choose the > older, C++ style of OO), etc, etc. And SQLite and Tcl/Tk itself show how > good the test system is. This is drifting from the point of this thread, but what is "modern OO" as opposed to "C++ style OO"? All OO systems I am familiar with (C++/C#/Java/PHP/JS) seem to me to be fundamentally the same, with differences stemming mostly from the language syntax and structure (such as dynamic binding). -- ˙uʍop-ǝpısdn sı ɹoʇıuoɯ ɹnoʎ 'sıɥʇ pɐǝɹ uɐɔ noʎ ɟı
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
