Thus said Gour on Sat, 03 Aug 2013 22:05:04 +0200: > > This is not to say that things shouldn't change in Fossil regarding > > how branches work. > > Well, recalling how much opposition was against using some more > 'standard' markup (ala markdown) and how long it took to implement it, > I would not hold by breath in regard to changing branches mechanism. > :-)
Sometimes it's a matter of simply convincing enough people about why the current mechanism is *wrong* (offering to write the code also helps). I personally don't see a problem with how branches work in Fossil, and in fact it is what drew me to using it (after having tried git), but I'm willing to be persuaded that it should be otherwise. :-) Please keep in mind that my opinions are not likely representative of the community---I've only been using Fossil for a few months. :-) Andy -- TAI64 timestamp: 4000000051fd6efc _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
