On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Benedikt Ahrens <benedikt.ahr...@gmx.net>wrote:
> > Hello, > > thanks a lot for your answers. > > The repository in question is a bit less than 100MB big and carries > around 30 binaries of up to 6MB each. > > I am aware that the fossil version I am using is outdated, but as Joseph > said, it is the version packaged in Debian stable, and in Ubuntu 12.04 > as well. Installing newer versions manually on all the machines involved > is not feasible in my situation. > You are aware that "installing" Fossil simply means copying the self-contained executable file into /usr/bin (or whatever other $PATH directory you want to use), right? There are no dependencies. You do not need to run configuration scripts or installers or update related packages or libraries or deal with package managers. Just copy *one file* into your $PATH on each machine where it matters. > My question was intended to be "Can I do something to the > repository---and not to fossil---in order to get things working again, > with version 1.22?" > > In line with what Joseph suggested I have filed a wishlist bug against > fossil in Debian, where I ask the package maintainer to package a recent > version of fossil for inclusion in unstable and testing (not backports, > though). > > Best, > Benedikt > > [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=718812 > > > > _______________________________________________ > fossil-users mailing list > fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org > http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users > -- D. Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
