On 18 August 2013 17:43, Stephan Beal <sgb...@googlemail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 5:20 PM, Michai Ramakers <m.ramak...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> 1) on host S: clone project from host S (http://S/my_repo) >> 2) on host C: clone project from host S (http://S/my_repo) >> 3) on host C: do some work, and commit changes >> 4) on host S, 'fossil up' >> 5) on host S: 'fossil timeline' doesn't show the recent commit >> 6) on host S: 'fossil pull' doesn't show the commit either in 'fossil >> timeline' >> 7) on host C: do more work, and commit changes >> 8) on host 'S': 'fossil up'; now all recent commits are seen > > > It sounds almost like you have autosync turned off - do 'up' and 'pull' show > any network traffic?
Tbh I forgot - the error-situation is gone now, sadly. >> Related question: I typically use 'fossil up', and never 'fossil sync' >> (or pull/push) in my workflow, working on 2 hosts on the same project >> - should I? > > > That doesn't sound wrong. If autosync is on there is rarely a need for > push/pull. Do an 'up' when you start working, to make sure you aren't > working from what would become a fork, and it will sync/push when you commit > (if autosync is on). Right. If it comes up again, I'll try to keep it as-is, if that's possible, and post it on here - who knows. Michai _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users