@Stephan Beal: Thanks man. And I'll admit I might have been a tick too
sensible about it. :-)

I'm very well aware that Windows is a bloated piece of ... code full of
deficiencies. But if something used to work well up to a certain version
(I'm using fossil since years, could have been 0.something if memory
serves), it does come accross... eccentric... to blame the OS (whichever it
is) all of a sudden.

Anyway, I did not want to go in too deep about the whole matter. I thought
you guys would want feedback on issues because it is a chance to improve
things (and make them work even on the crappiest of platforms ;-)). It
wasn't my intention to judge or blame anyone or anything.


On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Stephan Beal - sgb...@googlemail.com <
fossilscm.zoc.4adf3ee589.sgbeal#googlemail....@ob.0sg.net> wrote:

> On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 3:18 PM, <fossilscm....@xoxy.net> wrote:
>
>> Uh? My question was about the mailman mailing list?!? How is that related
>> to Windows?
>>
>
> Because your top-post came immediately after such a question i took it out
> of context.
>
> In any other respect, I take your response as rather... snobbish. Not sure
>> how much of it represent the fossil position, but If
>>
>
> Nothing i say should be interpreted as an official statement unless
> Richard echoes me ;). i'm just a minion here (though admittedly a loud one.
> ;)  Feel free to ignore anything i say and i won't take it personally. i
> apologize if it came across as snobbish (i did - i admit that). i was
> following the wildcard thread and i get really sick of people blaming
> fossil for Windows' broken CLI handling and filename/getenv encoding, which
> puts me in a snarky state of mind. My apologies for that.
>
>
>> fossil does not *want* to support windows, then it should remove the
>> windows edition instead of so obviously looking down on its (I'd suppose
>> many) windows users. But thanks anyway. :-(
>>
>
> Fossil wants to - _i_ don't want to ;). Plenty of people here have put in
> a great deal of effort to work around Windows' deficiencies (and yes, they
> are deficiencies). As a good example, the filename handling code - all of
> it is there only to support OS(es) which do "their own thing" regarding
> encoding of filenames.
>
> --
> ----- stephan beal
> http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/
> http://gplus.to/sgbeal
>
> _______________________________________________
> fossil-users mailing list
> fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
> http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
>
>
_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Reply via email to