[Default] On Wed, 11 Sep 2013 23:32:10 +0200, Stephan Beal
<sgb...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>> I wouldn't be interested in logging query-class commands, like
>> fossil ls, fossil status, fossil timeline
>>
>
>Do you mean the SQL code itself?
No, I now realize "query" is a confusing word.
I mean the class of commands that doesn't change anything to a
repository or a checkout is not interesting for logging.
So,
fossil {ls|status|timeline|changes|extra| ... }
don't have to be logged,
fossil {pull|push|sync|open|commit|stash| ... }
are interesting though.
>> usage -> commandtrace or commandhistory or cmdtrace or cmdhistory
>
> i think 3 of those might mess up the column alignment in 'help' ;).
Yeah, I'm happy with 'cmdhist' or 'chghist' or 'modhist' or 'shhist' ;)
--
Groet, Cordialement, Pozdrawiam, Regards,
Kees Nuyt
_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
