On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 4:37 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:

> If this is true, why couldn't fossil collapse that same effect for a
> manual commit step?
>

i'm not sure what you mean by that?


> My commit use model is I always select all and delete all predefined
> comments and paste in my own.
>

Mine is always to use -m ... ;).

Unless I am doing a merge and then I take advantage of the autogenerated
> sha1 artifact specified.
> But, then I have to remember to delete the dang '#' symbol!! :(
>
> It is more work to specify a message file, since my history/commit
> documents are appended and not isolated or new per commit.
>

AFAIK, nobody really uses the -M option (probably because it's too tedious
to use for most purposes, maybe unless you're auto-importing lists of
changes from another SCM). It was added back in December 2009, and IIRC it
was because someone on the list proposed it and i thought i'd be
interesting (but then i never used it myself).

As far as the other changes go regarding the # symbol - i'm still waiting
for someone else to volunteer :). As a general rule, i don't like to change
features which have survived the test of time (even if they're not 100%
ideal, so long as their limitations are well understood and not generally
problematic).

-- 
----- stephan beal
http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/
http://gplus.to/sgbeal
"Since tyranny's the only guaranteed byproduct of those who insist on a
perfect world, freedom will have to do." -- Bigby Wolf
_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Reply via email to