Thanks! Haha, I'll make every effort to be around when 2 digit years are a problem. Consider it designed in persistence vs obsolescence. :)
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 12:09 PM, Stephan Beal <[email protected]>wrote: > On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 5:47 PM, Stephan Beal <[email protected]>wrote: > >> >> On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 5:38 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I prefer: >>> YYMMDD HH:MM >>> instead of: >>> YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM >>> >> >> @Richard: i'll get that option added if you haven't done it by the time >> this hits the list. >> > > Added: > > http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/feef2d153c > > But IMO it doesn't at all look like a date (i don't think i've used a > two-digit year since well before the year 2000): > > 131018 11:46 > > -- > ----- stephan beal > http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/ > http://gplus.to/sgbeal > "Since tyranny's the only guaranteed byproduct of those who insist on a > perfect world, freedom will have to do." -- Bigby Wolf > > _______________________________________________ > fossil-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users > >
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
