On Tue, 29 Oct 2013 17:00:58 +0100, Ron Wilson <[email protected]> wrote:
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 8:43 AM, j. van den hoff
<[email protected]>wrote:
I principally have not thought otherwise. the "problem" is that wiki
changes are not "commit"ed but are done (and integrated into the repo)
via
the ui.
A quick look through the Fossil documentation, I don't see any thing to
suggest that a wiki edit is not treated as as commit. And given the
presence of the "fossil wiki commit" command, one might expect a wiki
edit
to be treated as a commit.
but they aren't, obviously (in the sense that the actions associated with
`fossil commit' (ask for commit message and, more important, in autosync
mode do the pull/checkin/push cycle) are not performed. but I agree that
one would expect it treated in this way (I did, basically).
--
Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
