a bit late I'd like to thank jan nijtmans for recently improving the
`timeline' command w.r.t. to `-n' behavior and introduction of `-W' (both
of which fixes/changes were long overdue in my view, really...).
I see only the following very minor issues:
1.
the newly introduced trailing comment line can confuse scripts processing
the `timeline' output since
it has variable content (either "=== line limit (20) reached ===" (if `n
20' is specified) or "=== entry limit (20) reached ===" (if `n` is not
specified at all) or missing altogether if the full timeline is
displayed). the `line' vs. `entry' difference presumably is unintentional
(is it?) but I probably would either always display that line or actually
remove it altogether. I would prefer the latter since the line anyway does
not tell me anything I do not know in the first place: I am either using
the default (and I should know from the help page that this is 20) or I
just have specified -n explicitely and don't need that reminder.
2.
`fossil help timeline' is a bit to terse regarding `-W', specifically it
should be mentioned that `-W 0' puts the ci comment on a single line (no
width limit).
--
Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
